Reset Password
If you've forgotten your password, you can enter your email address below. An email will then be sent with a link to set up a new password.
Cancel
Reset Link Sent
If the email is registered with our site, you will receive an email with instructions to reset your password. Password reset link sent to:
Check your email and enter the confirmation code:
Don't see the email?
  • Resend Confirmation Link
  • Start Over
Close
If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service
Hookup, Find Sex or Meet Someone Hot Now

Member Deleted Post  

posts

Member Deleted Post


This post has been deleted by

Tmptrzz 61F  
107039 posts
2/21/2019 12:09 pm

Good question hun and all I can say is been there done that and so over it..

Seduce the mind and see what a wonderful adventure the body will take you on..


Brassandass 64M/61F

2/21/2019 12:59 pm

Good post. My wife and I prefer local people, but sometimes it's hard to find a good match. We would rather travel a couple hours for the right person than cross the street for the wrong person. But there is no way we would get on an airplane to have sex with someone. Furthermore, if someone wanted to get on a plane to have sex with us the answer would be no.


redrockrascal 65M
23580 posts
2/21/2019 1:37 pm

First, I fall under the "people live in rural areas or in areas where the pool of members on is limited" exception. However, my travel is usually within 1 hour (one way). My assumption about your question is about flying, or a long drive, to meet someone. That said . . .

I have talked to women about meeting them out of state, or them coming here, for a sexual get together. Sidebar: Possible Mann Act violations . Actually, it has been brought up more than I would have imagined it might. And, once I talked to a woman and it turned out she wasn't interested in a sexual meet.

So, would I travel - yes. But, there are constraints (time and money mostly). I tend to lean toward meeting in the middle kind of thing for a couple reasons. 1. where I live is a rather dull place - not much to do in town. 2. in a situation where both people have to commit time and money those who aren't really "that into it" get weeded out.

When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.

The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.


lonlyforlove2 81M  
32704 posts
2/21/2019 1:46 pm

I am guilty of flying to just have a few days of good times, even flew internationally several times , but been many years (15) as we get more mature our needs are met better locally, and I am on the edge of a vast metropolitan area so lots to look at, if , I thought I needed it...Lala, glad you making noise again, the place had gotten to quiet..

Stop by at lonlyforlove2
also see Lunch with Lonly , we get snow tomorrow
Check my blog on New Community, "A photo of my big Pecker"
also, " My Sunday afternoon with the kids'


SwirlLoveCpl 54M/50F

2/21/2019 2:13 pm

The following comments are purely speculation, lol. It seems like someone who would get on a plane for sex or travel across state lines could be shady. Either they are in witness protection, married, or they are telling you straight out that this is a "one and done just traveling through town" scenario. And since it doesn't seem like there are a lot of men on the site who can afford to keep mistresses in different cities, I would think it's not about that. The "norm" for those willing to travel for sex seems to be just a couple hours of travel and minimal expense. For those willing to go above and beyond that.....somethings up with that. lol


helen_damnation 61F  
2487 posts
2/21/2019 4:06 pm

Weeeeell, I didn't travel just for sex. But there did happen to be someone I had been long distance friends with who happened to live in a city I was planning to visit anyway. Turned out we were *cough* quite compatible when we finally met irl. In many ways, not just sexual, but damn , it was the icing on the vacation cake. I have no regrets. But usually I won't even go to the next large city to meet. They need to be local.

I am the only Me you get.


superbjversion2 68F  
24388 posts
2/21/2019 4:08 pm

Been there. Done that. Don't like it. So no Itinerant Lovers or Migrant Romeos for me. I am not a traveler's rest stop nor a tourist attraction.

That being said....I do still make exceptions. Almost always for the opportunity to meet a fellow blogger. I try to coordinate it with a vacation or a visit to out of state family. Sex is not the main purpose for meeting - but it's been known to happen anyway.

Opportunity may knock only once, but temptation bangs on the door forever!


redrockrascal 65M
23580 posts
2/21/2019 4:24 pm

BiggLala replies on 2/21/2019 6:10 pm:
Okay, see? I don't consider you to be in any of these caveats...at ALL. From what I know of you, you would have no issues meeting a sufficient number of women if you lived in a larger area, nor would you refuse to meet/date them if you did and solely chose to travel to have sex with women.

As SwirlLoveCpl said, I think those people are shady (yes, someone we used to know fell in this category who, as I later learned was, in fact, extremely slim shady...oooops )
----------------------------
True, I would not refuse to meet/date any local if there were a good number of them (think Phx) and I would not chose solely to travel to have sex with women. But traveling would be an open option.

I'm not going to assume people are shady based just on their travel/sex preferences. But it would make me curious.

When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.

The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.


traveljunkie13 56F
11089 posts
2/21/2019 4:38 pm

Ok so...

I traveled to Scotland to visit a friend...see Glasgow and Edinburgh and a bit of the Highlands...and have sex. We'd gone from chatting on here to chatting on Skype and well... I went to Scotland. Beautiful country btw, you should check it out if you can.

I've traveled to Boston...to play sub. It was fun...until he was a dick. He also wasn't that great a Dom. So...lesson learned.

Basically...I'm a travel junkie! But for a while I did prefer to interact with men who did not live any where close to me. I didn't want to be running into them at the grocery store and since I couldn't host...it was just easier for me to drive to them. I just liked keeping my interactions on this site far away from everyday life.


CleavageFan4U 67M
69374 posts
2/21/2019 6:56 pm

Humm, I don't think I've encountered a woman that travels just for sex. But I guess I do see some logic in it. If it is "just sex", the distance means you're not likely to run in to them at a local restaurant or whatever.

I do travel, for both work and for sex - with women I already knew, and the meetings were much much more than just sex. And I can recall three instances were women travel hundreds of miles to be with me too. But those were special circumstances, and the women involved did not routinely travel to be with men just for sex.

Double Cs or MORE, on HNW
Do You See It
This Kind of Sucks
[post 3312759] My Private Blog - Tell Me ALL Your Secret


The12er 51M
295 posts
2/21/2019 10:24 pm

Took a trip to the Canadian Rockies for skiing and sex for a week bac in the ICQ days.... still talk to her on and off on Skype ( no sex though)


smartasswoman 66F  
35813 posts
2/21/2019 10:55 pm

Interesting, I don’t think I’ve ever encountered someone here, who met your narrow definition.

But, in one case I did let myself get talked into getting involved with a guy who wasn’t local (something I had tried to avoid up until then). He lived a four hour drive away and we’d hook up as he was passing through MSP on business trips. Or so he said. After a while, everything started to seem pretty shady and for all I know even that could have been a lie. I do know that a friend of mine who had access to records was able to ascertain that there was no one with his name who had his model of car registered, in Minnesota. So for sure he was lying about something. I’m pretty sure he was married.

All of which reinforced my thinking that It’s best to get involved with someone who is local and is willing for me to visit their house...it’s a reasonable safeguard against them being married or having a live-in girlfriend.


TicklePlease 56F  
13851 posts
2/22/2019 3:34 am

I'm exempt! I'm exempt!

I don't know anyone who travels for sex only... There's always a connection of a sort to build on... But yeah... that speaks of a failure to be able to communicate and manage interpersonal relationships so people who seek out far away sex partners are probably going to be a non-starter for me.

Honestly, if someone can't find a sex partner locally (exempting those you mentioned) what makes them think geography is going to make a difference?


lindoboy100 61M
23969 posts
2/22/2019 7:09 am

I once met an American truck driver who told me that he was gonna get in his truck and drive 'right on over there to scotland to say hello'. Even if I was into guys, I could never exchange fluids with someone so stupid......

But aye, I'd travel if there was enough chemistry. I have done before, saw the girl several times.


GhostofH 65M
22788 posts
2/22/2019 8:56 am

Great post! And quite apropos for this site, so Bravo!

I will take this from a different angle. I know of some who travel for sex due to either who they are, their social circumstances, or perhaps even unique kinks.

The first instance, Who they are..... depending on the size of their locale, even those in larger metropolitan areas are not always able to play locally due to being known or recognized (now I am referring to those attached). So they need to get out of town to play. Social circumstances is sort of in the same realm especially those who are attached or well known locally.

Unique kinks is something much broader. I know of couples who dont swing locally, but will hop on a plane and fly down to Vegas or another city for fun. Also those that want to explore the darker sides of themselves is not always available locally.

So my comment is, I think this is much more wide spread than you think.


MyBaffies 54M
4983 posts
2/22/2019 9:06 am

What do I think of people who travel for sex? I don't. What they do is entirely up to them.

Would I travel? Depends. I'm city-based but there doesn't appear to be much of a match in my catchment area so perhaps I need to travel. I did have an FWB from here for a year and she was about 40 miles away which was just under an hour by car, but we'd chatted and got to know each other online first before any meet.

I'm not sure I'd drive 75 miles for sex unless I knew the person first. Why would you take two hours out of your life just to be disappointed and then drive another two hours back?

Baffies

Link to my blog: MyBaffies


VenusRedux2 49F
557 posts
2/23/2019 5:40 am

There is a goldilocks distance for people. They need to be close enough for spontaneous encounters, but not so close that you're bumping into them awkwardly at the supermarket. On the other hand, you don't want them so far away that meeting up becomes a NASA launch with 90 departments having to give a Go/No-Go for launch.

For me, a half hour's drive would feel about right.

I'm trying to put myself in the position of someone who only wants an hour's drive.

I would also understand that people don't want this to be a "lifestyle." They want to meet someone from time to time, but not have the pressure of "How about this weekend? What about next?" The distance is being used as a natural barrier to prevent that.

Maybe they're married. Married people instinctively want to keep this stuff as far away from their families as possible. However, too much of a distance is a bad idea. The last thing you want is an unexpected break down or accident and you have to explain why you're paying for a tow truck in Timbuktu. But let me not elaborate further, I'm not here to write the cheater's manifesto.


TrucknLuvn 59M/41F  
1622 posts
2/28/2019 11:01 pm

This is a tricky one for us seeing as we "travel" for a living. We are always interested in meeting new people in any location across America. That being said, we typically try to meet others under a friendship only/first premise, but we aren't against pursuing more if everyone is on board.

So...

Technically, yes, we do travel for sex. But only if our job takes us there first.

♡Jess: The Trucker Babe

♡♡♡

Want more? Be sure to check out my blog: TrucknLuvn!


TrucknLuvn 59M/41F  
1622 posts
2/28/2019 11:05 pm

    Quoting TrucknLuvn:
    This is a tricky one for us seeing as we "travel" for a living. We are always interested in meeting new people in any location across America. That being said, we typically try to meet others under a friendship only/first premise, but we aren't against pursuing more if everyone is on board.

    So...

    Technically, yes, we do travel for sex. But only if our job takes us there first.
Sorry to double dip...

Before Honey Balls and I met, he was "Mr. No Distance Is Too Far For A Trucker" in regards to meeting others for some nook. In fact, he traveled over 400 miles in a snowstorm to meet me for the first time.

And I am incredibly glad that he did. ♡

♡Jess: The Trucker Babe

♡♡♡

Want more? Be sure to check out my blog: TrucknLuvn!


marriedcretin 54M
1324 posts
3/7/2019 12:09 am

When I first moved out in to the wilds of Aberdeenshire 25 years ago I got a lot of attention from the local ladies...I always used to joke that it was because I was a new source of DNA for the gene pool...the gene pool out here can be pretty stagnant.


wickedeasy 74F
32404 posts
3/11/2019 3:11 pm

does intent count?

yanno, did you have to travel just for the sex or could you travel and then get sex just kinda anyway

You cannot conceive the many without the one.


Become a member to create a blog